Throughout my years in Creative Writing, when I have passed out printed copies of my poems, I have received them back with advice and questions of logic. That is what workshopping has taught us to do! Poems are brought into the workshopping space to come into themselves. So, this past unit in Creative Writing two, when I handed out my poem and read it aloud, I was delighted to hear and receive actual analysis.
In the first half of our poetry unit in Creative Writing two, we learned about the four temperaments: music, imagination, structure, and story. And though I have a complicated relationship with this way of analyzing poetry, it meant that we were bringing each other’s work into the space and truly identifying how the art affected the reader. We were viewing one another’s poems as whole works that need not be altered nor improved. We did our best to discuss as though the author was not in the room with us. The poet would read aloud and the group would split into the four temperaments to identify how they are used in the poem. I found it wildly amusing to watch people debate over what they thought my writing meant. At times, I was given the opportunity to share my perspective on my writing, and the most exciting part was: my input was no more true than anyone else’s. We were all interpreting what my writing meant. This allowed me to identify the parts of my poem that didn’t come across the way I had hoped they would.
The act of workshopping is to find ways to communicate a poem’s message with more eloquence and tact. Therefore, how can workshopping be productive if a poem’s meaning hasn’t been verbally interpreted by its receivers? From now on, I will always treat the work of my peers as complete and ready for analysis, while allowing my analysis to inform the future alterations to the poem.










